MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411875047 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-33sl7

Dendrite initiation and deflection in biaxially compressed solid electrolytes

2025· preprint· en· W4411875047 on OpenAlexaff
Teng Cui, Sunny Wang, Samuel Lee, Eddie Barks, John Cattermull, Celeste Melamed, Zhelong Jiang, Leah Narun, Yan‐Kai Tzeng, Seung Hyan Kim, Xin Xu, Geoff McConohy, Paul A. W. Wallace, Andrew C. Lee, Xiao Cui, Joon‐Hyung Lee, William C. Chueh, X. Wendy Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDeflection (physics)Dendrite (mathematics)ElectrolyteComposite materialForensic engineeringEngineeringChemistryGeometryPhysicsOpticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium metal solid-state batteries offer advantages of high energy density and improved safety compared with lithium ion batteries. However, solid-state batteries fail through short-circuiting even at low charging rates (<1 mA/cm2) due to lithium dendrite initiation and propagation. The location of dendrite initiation is still under debate, particularly between initiation at the surface and within the interior of the solid electrolyte. Here, we develop an in-plane biaxial compression method that provides direct evidence of dendrite initiation within the interior of garnet solid electrolytes. The biaxial compression also deflects dendrite propagation to be perpendicular to the electric field direction and prevents short-circuiting at extreme fast charging of 100 mA/cm2. This approach demonstrates the use of mechanics to address pressing challenges in next generation batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyFrench-language works237,207