MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Susceptibility of both female and male mice to acute kidney injury (AKI): protective effect of P2Y14 receptor inhibition

2025· article· en· W4411875563 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Philippe C. Lavoie, Christine Légaré, Sonia Francoeur, Sylvie Breton

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute kidney injuryMedicineReceptorKidneyInternal medicinePhysiologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While sex is increasingly considered as a critical variable in kidney health, female mice and patients remain underrepresented in preclinical and clinical studies. Ischemic-induced AKI is a frequent complication in hospitalized patients. Here, we assessed the severity of AKI in female and male C57BL/CBAF1mice subjected to bilateral ischemia-reperfusion injury (BIRI), with a clamping time of 35 min and reperfusion for 24 h (n ≥ 8 mice per group). SHAM surgeries were performed without clamping. Based on plasma creatinine (pCre), females showed an apparent AKI protection versus males (females: fold increase of pCre-BIRI/SHAM = 1.6, p=0.18, versus males: pCre-BIRI/SHAM = 7.8, p=0.005). BIRI induced a 2.8-fold increase in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) versus SHAM in females (p=0.04), and a 5.2-fold increase in males (p<0.001). A significant increase in the percentage of severely damaged proximal tubules (PTs), characterized by a complete loss of AQP1 polarity, was observed in both females (61% BIRI vs 0% SHAM, p = 0.03) and males (45% BIRI vs 0% SHAM, p = 0.001). WB showed an increase in the expression of acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ASCL4), indicating induction of ferroptosis by BIRI, in females and males. We previously showed that the pro-inflammatory P2Y14 receptor is a key driver of AKI in male mice. Here, both females and males treated with the P2Y14 antagonist, PPTN, showed reduced severity of BIRI-induced AKI versus the non-treated group, as evidenced by: 1) reduced BUN elevation (BIRI-PPTN = 7.82 mmol/L versus BIRI-vehicle = 16.02 mmol/L, p=0.03 in females, and BIRI-PPTN = 18.22 mmol/L versus BIRI-vehicle = 33.62, p=0.05 in males); 2) reduction in the percentage of damaged PTs (BIRI-PPTN = 1.1%, p=0.002 versus BIRI-vehicle in females, and BIRI-PPTN= 16.4%, p=0.03 versus BIRI-vehicle in males); 3) expression of ASCL4 similar to that of SHAM levels in females and males. Interestingly, a lower dose of PPTN was required in females (5 mg/kg/day) versus males (10 mg/kg/day) to achieve maximal response. In addition, preliminary results showed a BIRI-induced increase in Ly6G positive neutrophils in kidney sections from males and females, and reduction of neutrophil numbers upon PPTN treatment. We are currently analyzing, by LC-MS/MS, the renal expression of lipids potentially involved in the inflammatory response (prostaglandins, leukotrienes, endocannabinoids and their congeners) after BIRI with and without PPTN treatment. Overall, our results show that both females and males can develop ischemic-AKI, and that pCre is a poor marker of AKI in females. Finally, this study shows that attenuation of renal inflammation via P2Y14 inhibition protects against ferroptosis and reduces the extent of kidney dysfunction and damage following ischemia-reperfusion injury in both female and male mice. CIHR PJT-183711-2022 This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207