MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411877586 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v17n4p24

The Multiple Burden of Malnutrition in Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Policies

2025· article· en· W4411877586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deepali Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalnutritionLow and middle income countriesDouble burdenEnvironmental healthEconomic growthDeveloping countryDevelopment economicsBusinessSocioeconomicsMedicineEconomicsBody mass index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenomenon of the multiple burden of malnutrition, which includes undernutrition, overweight, obesity, and micronutrient deficiencies, presents a significant public health challenge in middle-income countries (MICs). However, there is scanty literature that examines the MICs as a separate group, with most combining the MICS with the low-income countries. Most of the studies explore the malnutrition issue in the LMICs (Low and middle-income countries). Given their importance in the global landscape, the MICs deserve a separate examination. This study presents the status, trends and burden of malnutrition in the MICs and uses color mapping schemes to identify malnutrition hotspots. The analysis points to the existence of multiple burdens of malnutrition in these countries. The study reviews the drivers of malnutrition. The results suggest that effective strategies must integrate multi-sectoral approaches that address the shared drivers of malnutrition, including food insecurity and dietary patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health Science→Same topicChild Nutrition and Water Access→French-language works237,207→