MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effects of Acute Ozone Pollution Exposure on Muscle Sympathetic Activity and Cardiac-Autonomic Control

2025· article· en· W4411879991 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephen A. Busch, Aidan K. Comeau, Jiho Song, J Sangha, Michael G. Leahy, Chris Carlsten, Michael S. Koehle, A. William Sheel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSympathetic activityCardiac muscleAutonomic nervous systemOzoneCardiologyAutonomic functionHeart rate variabilityInternal medicinePhysiologyAnesthesiaHeart rateBlood pressureChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ground level ozone (O 3 ) is a respiratory irritant well established to cause reductions in lung function. O 3 exposure may also promote progressive autonomic imbalance to the cardiovascular system as previously indicated by reductions in heart rate variability (HRV) and elevated basal blood pressure. However, no studies have directly assessed whether muscle sympathetic activity (MSNA) increases in this context. This study investigated whether short-term O 3 exposure promotes autonomic imbalance (via MSNA and HRV), with O 3 exposure being hypothesized to both decrease HRV and increase MSNA. Our secondary objective was to validate O 3 induced reductions in lung function as shown in previous studies. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy adults (female N. = 12; 23 ± 4 years [mean ± SD]) were randomized to a single 90 minute, double-blinded exposure of either: (i) artificial O 3 (0.75 parts per million [ppm]; N.14) or (ii) room air (RA) (naturally occurring O 3 <0.01 ppm). Spirometry was performed pre/post exposure, while blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography), MSNA (microneurography [N. 25]), and HRV (Lead~II ECG) were measured at several points during exposure. MSNA was quantified as burst frequency (burst/min) and burst incidence (burst/100 heart beats [hb]). HRV was averaged (5-minute bins) and assessed through time-domain (mean and standard deviation RR interval, root squared mean successive differences, percentage of RR interval differences >50ms) and frequency-domain (high frequency [ 0.15-0.4 Hz), low frequency [0.04-0.15 Hz], low/high frequency ratio) indices. Delta MSNA,HRV, and blood pressure were analyzed during exposure using two-way repeated measures ANOVA model. Pre/post exposure spirometry was assessed through students t-test. Results: O 3 and RA groups showed no difference in baseline lung function (forced expiratory volume [FEV 1 ] ~ 4.58 ± 0.98 vs 4.3 ± 0.84 L), heart rate (62 ± 8 vs 61 ± 6 beats/min), arterial pressure (MAP~87 ± 9 vs 81 ± 5 mmHg, p=0.06), burst frequency (16 ± 5 vs 16 ± 5 bursts/min), burst incidence (25 ± 10 vs 25 ± 10 bursts/100hb) and HRV time/frequency domain measures. O 3 group, but not RA, saw a reduced post-exposure FEV 1 (-8 ± 9% p<0.01 vs baseline). MAP response was unchanged between groups during exposure, while O 3 group showed greater time-dependent increases than RA group in burst frequency (+7 ± 4 vs +2 ± 3 bursts/min at 90 minutes exposure, p<0.05) and incidence (+10 ± 7 vs +3 ± 5 bursts/100hb at 90 minutes exposure, p<0.05). No differences were found in HRV time and frequency domain responses between O 3 and RA groups during exposure. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence of short-term O 3 induced sympathetic vasomotor activation that accompanies reductions in lung function. The increase of MSNA demonstrates sympathetic activation is present during initial O 3 exposure, and may partly contribute to early autonomic imbalance in the absence of observable changes to blood pressure and HRV. Supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (AWS; SAB) and a Killam Laureate Doctoral Scholarship (SAB). This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207