MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Central-peripheral respiratory chemoreflex interaction changes with acclimatization to high altitude

2025· article· en· W4411880111 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nasimi A. Guluzade, Trevor A. Day, Richard J. A. Wilson, Daniel A. Keir

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMount Royal UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcclimatizationPeripheralEffects of high altitude on humansRespiratory systemAltitude (triangle)BiologyMedicineInternal medicineAnatomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: With chronic exposure to hypobaric hypoxia, the medullary (central) and arterial (peripheral) respiratory chemoreflexes become sensitized (i.e., ventilatory acclimatization). Whether the interaction between chemoreceptors is also altered has not been assessed. PURPOSE & HYPOTHESIS: We investigated the peripheral chemoreflex response to hypoxia at increasing arterial and central CO 2 tensions in humans at 1100 m (low altitude: Calgary, Canada) and after 7 days at 3800 m (high altitude: La Paz, Bolivia). We hypothesized that ventilatory acclimatization alters central and peripheral chemoreceptor interaction. METHOD: Seventeen participants (8 females; mean±SD age: 27±5 years) completed two repetitions of modified rebreathing with end-tidal PO 2 (P ET O 2 ) clamped at 150, 60, and 45 mmHg over two visits at each location. End-tidal PCO 2 (P ET CO 2 ), P ET O 2 , ventilation (V· E ), and saturation (S p O 2 ) were measured breath-by-breath by dual gas analyser, volume turbine, and pulse oximeter. The V· E vs. P ET CO 2 relationship in the hyperoxic test gave the central chemoreflex response to PCO 2 and the hypoxic tests provided combined central-peripheral chemoreflex responses. ANALYSIS: The slope of the V· E vs. P ET CO 2 (V· E S, L·min -1 ·mmHg -1 ) of each iso-oxic condition was obtained by fitting a piecewise model. Linear regression was used to determine peripheral chemoreflex sensitivity (PChS: L·min -1 ·mmHg -1 ·% S c O 2 -1 ) at each P ET CO 2 as previously described (Guluzade et al. 2023). These steps were repeated every 1 mmHg of P ET CO 2 to build a PChS vs. PCO 2 relationship for each participant. Individual PChS-P ET CO 2 relationships were fit with linear (additive) and polynomial (non-additive) functions. Akaike Information Criterion identified the best-fit model. Results: Two-way (isoxic condition x location) repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that V· E S rose from low-to-high altitude (p<0.001) and with isoxic PO 2 (p<0.001) from 4.0±2.1 to 7.2±5.4 L·min -1 ·mmHg -1 at 150 mmHg, 6.3±3.5 to 9.7±4.9 L·min -1 ·mmHg -1 at 60 mmHg, and 7.7±4.8 to 11.5±5.1 L·min -1 ·mmHg -1 at 45 mmHg. The PChS vs. P ET CO 2 relationship was best described by an additive (linear) model in 12 and 13 of 17 participants at low and high altitude, respectively. At low altitude, five participants had a hypo-additive interaction (decelerating polynomial), and, at high altitude, four participants exhibited hyper-additivity (accelerating polynomial). All five hypo-additive individuals became additive after a week at 3800 m and four additive participants became hyper-additive. Conclusion: Findings support differential between-participant respiratory chemoreflex interaction that is modified with acclimatization at high altitude in a hypo-to-hyper-additive manner. NSERC Discovery (D.A.K, RGPIN-2021-03980; T.A.D., RGPIN-2024-04182; R.J.A.W., RGPIN-2020-05312), UCalgary Transdisciplinary Connector and HBI RHISE grants. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2025 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207