MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Ganciclovir to Prevent Reactivation of Cytomegalovirus in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Failure: A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4411881704 on OpenAlexaff
Renee D. Stapleton, Gordon D. Rubenfeld, Sayan Dasgupta, Dale M. Needham, R. Duncan Hite, Ithan D. Peltan, Ellen L. Burnham, Matthew C. Exline, Cynthia E. Fisher, D. Clark Files, Todd W. Rice, Mayur Ramesh, Andrew Goodwin, Cristina Vazquez Guillamet, Michelle N. Gong, A. Duggal, Robert C. Hyzy, Scott R. Gunn, Alicia Parker, Lenore Kimball, Sara S. Ardren, Holly Gundacker, Zhiming Zhou, Yu Chen, Yunda Huang, Wendy M. Leisenring, Michael Boeckh, A.P. Limaye

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGanciclovirPlaceboAcute respiratory failureRandomized controlled trialSepsisCytomegalovirusRespiratory failureIntensive care medicineInternal medicineImmunologyHuman cytomegalovirusMechanical ventilationHerpesviridaeViral diseaseVirusPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction and Rationale: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill adults is associated with worse respiratory and clinical outcomes, but a causal role remains uncertain. We sought to determine whether ganciclovir prophylaxis, by decreasing CMV reactivation, increases respiratory support-free days (RSFDs) in critically ill CMV-seropositive adults with sepsis-associated acute respiratory failure. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, 16-center randomized trial enrolled immunocompetent CMV-seropositive adults with sepsis-associated acute respiratory failure from June 2021-October 2024. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice daily for 5 days, then once daily) or placebo until the earlier of hospital discharge or 28 days. Participants were followed for 180 days. The primary outcome was RSFDs by day 28. Key secondary outcomes were also analyzed, including mortality through day 28 and day 180, hematologic and renal toxicities, CMV reactivation in plasma, and other reportable adverse events. Results: Among 213 randomized participants (mean age 59 years, 53% women, 76% on invasive mechanical ventilation at enrollment), 205 (96%) received ≥1 dose of study medication (N=106 ganciclovir, N=99 placebo). By day 180, 62 died, 17 were unable to be contacted but 8 of these were known to be alive, 8 withdrew/refused further contact, 24 continue in follow-up, and 94 have completed the study. The trial was terminated early, based on DSMB recommendation, with N=213 participants enrolled representing 43% of the N=500 target sample size. Study termination was recommended due to concerns of futility and increased mortality in the ganciclovir arm. Among participants receiving ≥1 dose of study drug, RSFDs were similar between study arms, and mortality was higher among ganciclovir recipients at both day 28 and day 180 (Table). There were no significant differences in neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or renal dysfunction by day 28 between the arms. By day 28, CMV reactivation in plasma was significantly lower in the ganciclovir group (Table). Full follow-up data and additional secondary and exploratory endpoint data will be available at the ATS International Conference presentation. Conclusions: Among critically ill, CMV-seropositive adults with sepsis-associated respiratory failure, ganciclovir prophylaxis did not increase RSFDs and was associated with higher mortality, but without increased known ganciclovir-associated toxicities. The mechanism(s) underlying increased mortality with ganciclovir warrant further investigation. Ganciclovir should not be routinely used for prophylaxis of CMV reactivation in critically-ill adults without an underlying immunosuppressive condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research→French-language works237,207→