Children’s Improvement After Language and Rhythm Training With the Digital Medical Device Poppins for Dyslexia: Single-Arm Intervention Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Specific learning disorder in reading (SLD reading), commonly named dyslexia, is a neurodevelopmental condition affecting reading. Current best practice recommendations for SLD reading emphasize the necessity of including graphophonological interventions. The serious game Mila-Learn, which is based on rhythm training, showed promising results in a prior randomized trial. However, it lacked a component of graphophonological training. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Poppins, a new digital medical device that combines rhythm-based and graphophonological training for improving reading and phonological skills in children with SLD reading. We also explored its performance against Mila-Learn, the earlier version based on rhythm training only. METHODS: A single-arm study without an active control group was conducted with 38 children (aged 7-11 years) diagnosed with SLD reading. The participants completed an 8-week training program with Poppins (five 20-minute sessions per week). Pre- and posttraining assessments measured reading accuracy and speed, phoneme deletion, and phonological discrimination. Statistical analysis included pre- and postcomparisons (primary analysis) and comparisons with children's improvement from a previous randomized controlled trial of Mila-Learn, an earlier version of the device (exploratory analysis). RESULTS: The participants demonstrated significant improvements in reading accuracy (+11.46 words correctly read; P<.001), reading speed (+10.26 words read; P<.001), and phoneme deletion (+2.87 points; P<.001). No significant change was observed in reading comprehension for younger participants (grades 2-3; P=.09), although improvements were noted in older children (grades 4-5, P=.03). Exploratory analysis comparing children's improvements with Mila-Learn and Poppins revealed similar gains in reading accuracy and speed but revealed superior improvement in phonological skills for the Poppins group, with a moderate effect size according to the benchmarks by Cohen (Cohen d=0.48, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Poppins is an effective and safe tool for enhancing reading and phonological skills in children with SLD reading. By integrating rhythm-based and graphophonological exercises, the device aligns with best practice recommendations for curative intervention. Future research should explore its long-term effects and medicoeconomic impact and compare outcomes with those of conventional therapy, as serious games provide an engaging, scalable method for delivering such interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06596980; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06596980.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".