MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411882277 · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60918-8

Microbial bioremediation of persistent organic pollutants in plant tissues provides crop growth promoting liquid fertilizer

2025· article· en· W4411882277 on OpenAlexafffund
James Butcher, Claire Villette, Julie Zumsteg, Loïc Maurer, T. Barchietto, Richard Rigo, Kevin Floch, Sergej Buchet, Alain Stintzi, Dimitri Heintz

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersRégion NormandieMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaGenome CanadaOntario GenomicsOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationAgence de l'Eau Seine-NormandieOntario Genomics Institute
KeywordsBioremediationPollutantFertilizerEnvironmental sciencePlant growthEnvironmental chemistryCropChemistryBiologyBiotechnologyAgronomyEcologyContamination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Constructed wetlands are used to clean domestic wastewater via phytoremediation, commonly involving the use of reeds. The process results in the production of large amounts of polluted plant tissues, which are then considered unusable waste products. In this study, the reusability of reeds and nettle-polluted tissues is investigated. Fermenting contaminated plant tissues to produce liquid fertilizer is a sustainable means to remove 87-95% of persistent organic pollutants. A multiomics approach combining metabolomics and amplicon metagenomics is used to analyze the mechanisms that occur during fertilizer production from polluted plant tissues and identify the microbes that are likely key for this transformation. A consortium of bacteria and fungi with cellulolytic activity is identified. In addition, the obtained liquid fertilizer positively impacts plant growth in the presence of pathogens and therefore exhibits potential application in farming. This approach may be a simple, commercially attractive solution for the management of contaminated plant tissues originating from constructed wetlands, which are currently considered problematic, useless waste products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207