MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effect of Biologic Therapies on Serum Metabolic Biomarkers in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

2025· article· en· W4411884060 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Keith Colaco, Laura Bumbulis, Vinod Chandran, Richard J. Cook, Dafna D. Gladman, Lihi Eder

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkKrembil FoundationUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsoriatic arthritisCreatinineInternal medicineMetaboliteCohortRenal functionEndocrinologyGastroenterologyPharmacologyArthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives Since biologic therapies such as TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) may affect the cardio-metabolic profile of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA),[1-3] we assessed their short-term effects on serum metabolites in patients with PsA, and determined whether these metabolite changes differed across the 2 drug classes. Methods A nested cohort study was conducted among participants with available serum samples from a longitudinal PsA cohort who initiated TNFi or IL-17i therapy. Serum samples prior to initiation of therapy, and 3 to 6 months after initiation of therapy, were used to quantify 64 metabolic biomarkers using a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance targeted metabolomics panel, which comprised lipid particles, amino acids and various other metabolites. T tests were used to compare differences in metabolite levels before versus after therapy within each drug class. Linear mixed effects models assessed the effect of each drug class on changes in metabolite levels adjusting for age, sex, lipid lowering drugs, diabetes, hypertension and menopause. Results 163 patients were analyzed between 2013 and 2021 (mean age 51 ± 12.6 years, 45.5% female). Among TNFi users, levels of alanine, glycine, citrate and creatinine significantly increased post-treatment, whereas levels of glycoprotein acetyls (GlycA), a marker of systemic inflammation, decreased. Among IL-17i users, concentrations of citrates significantly increased post-treatment, whereas alanine, glycine, histidine, GlycA and creatinine decreased. When comparing biomarkers between classes of medications, post- and pre-treatment levels differed significantly for alanine, glycine, histidine, citrate, GlycA and creatinine. In models adjusted for age and sex involving TNFi users, levels of alanine (Estimate [EST] 0.034; 95% CI 0.008, 0.06), glycine (EST 0.029; 95% CI 0.02, 0.04), phenylalanine (EST 0.006; 95% CI 0.001, 0.01), citrate (EST 0.008; 95% CI 0.005, 0.01) and creatinine (EST 3.87; 95% CI 0.41, 7.4) increased post-treatment, whereas acetate (EST −0.03; 95% CI −0.03,−0.02) and GlycA (EST −0.05; 95% CI −0.09,−0.01) decreased (Table 1). In models adjusted for age and sex involving IL-17i users, changes were observed among fewer biomarkers, with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size (EST 0.04; 95% CI 0.009, 0.07) increasing post-treatment, and levels of histidine (EST−0.005; 95% CI −0.008,−0.003) and acetone (EST −0.005; 95% CI −0.009,−0.001) decreasing. Conclusion TNFi and IL-17i appear to differentially affect the metabolic profile of patients with PsA. Treatment with TNFi was associated with more changes in metabolite profiles than IL-17i, including changes associated with systemic inflammation (GlycA) and amino acids. The implication of these changes on long-term cardio-metabolic risk needs further research. [1.] Roubille C. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74(3):480-9. [2.] Sattar N. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56(3):831-9. [3.] Merola JF. Rheumatol Ther 2022;9(3):935-55.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→French-language works237,207→