MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411884065 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0314.16

Clinical Significance of Magnetic Resonance Enterography Detected Sacroiliitis in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4411884065 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Aaisham Ali, Vishal Kalia, I. N. Ross, Luke Daichendt, Julia Sawicka, Michael L. Miller, Sarah Wells, Eileen Crowley, Roberta Berard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreChildren’s Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSacroiliitisAsymptomaticRetrospective cohort studyCohortPediatric gastroenterologyCrohn's diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingDiseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyCoronal planeRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives The musculoskeletal (MSK) system is the most frequent extraintestinal manifestation (EIM) in Crohn’s disease (CD).[1] One pediatric study has reported on asymptomatic sacroiliitis (SI) in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (pIBD), detecting this in 15% (5/34).[2] MSK EIMs can have a serious impact on patients’ quality of life and are associated with increased severity of bowel disease activity in pIBD.[3] Given the paucity of literature on this topic, we aim to describe the prevalence of asymptomatic SI and its relationship to clinical characteristics, bowel disease phenotype, intestinal disease activity scores, biomarkers, and other EIMs of disease. Methods In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, data were collected from newly diagnosed (<1 year) pediatric CD patients who had undergone magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) at Children’s Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre over 4 years (2019-2023). Subjects were excluded if the sacroiliac joints were unable to be adequately assessed by the radiologist or if the patient had a previously known diagnosis of spondyloarthritis. Coronal T1, axial T2, and coronal T2W sequences with fat suppression of the MREs were evaluated by an MSK-trained radiologist, with a secondary read by a pediatric-trained MSK radiologist (25% of the cases) to establish inter-rater reliability. Descriptive statistics were used to describe baseline characteristics and group comparisons. Results Among 135 patients with CD who underwent MRE, 10 patients (7.4%) showed evidence of SI on MRE. Patients were sub-categorized as acute SI (2.2%), chronic SI (3%), and acute on chronic SI (2.2%) (Table 1). Half of the patients with evidence of SI on MRE had evidence of inflammatory MSK manifestations. Patients with SI had higher frequency of arthralgia (p-value 0.033), joint swelling (p-value 0.039), and enthesitis (p-value 0.019). There were no significant differences in symptoms of back pain, neither mechanical nor inflammatory. Patients with SI did have significantly higher Simple Endoscopic Scores-CD at initial scope assessment compared to those without (p-value 0.006). Table 1: Clinical characteristics of pediatric Crohn’s disease patients with magnetic resonance enterography imaging. Conclusion Among newly diagnosed pediatric CD patients who underwent MRE examination, 7.4% were identified to have SI. Patients with CD and SI were more likely to report other MSK symptoms and had higher CD endoscopic scores. Limitations of this study include the lack of systematic rheumatology assessment of CD patients for MSK signs/symptoms. Further analyses are planned to evaluate the bowel disease outcomes in patients with SI over time. [1.] Ali A. ACR Open Rheumatol 2022;4(6):547-54. [2.] Giani T. Pediatr Rheumatol 2020;18(1):1-6. [3.] Derfalvi B. Pediatr Rheumatol 2022;20(1):1-9.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→