MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sialic Acid Binding Ig-Like Lectin 1 is a Biomarker of Disease Activity in Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies

2025· article· en· W4411884121 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nathan Barreth, Eugene Krustev, Cristina Moran Toro, A Clarke, Yvan St‐Pierre, Paul Sciore, Marvin J. Fritzler, Marie Hudson, Valérie Leclair, May Y. Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiomarkerMyositisDermatomyositisPolymyositisInternal medicineImmunologyAutoimmune diseaseInclusion body myositisGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives Sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1 (SIGLEC1) is an adhesion molecule expressed on monocytes and macrophages, a surrogate marker for the Type I Interferon pathway, and a candidate biomarker for several autoimmune diseases. This study aimed to investigate serum SIGLEC1 levels as a novel biomarker for (1) disease activity in autoimmune inflammatory myopathies (AIM); and (2) clinical AIM manifestations. Methods AIM patients enrolled in a multisite study registry with routine venipuncture samples bio-banked at baseline visits were included. Baseline clinical data were utilized. Sera were tested for SIGLEC1 using a capture immunoassay (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego CA). The physician global disease activity assessment (PGA), which ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (very severe disease), was used to rate overall disease activity in AIM patients classified as having active (PGA ≥2) or inactive (PGA <2) disease. Patients were also classified as having active or inactive disease for 6 individual organ systems included in the myositis disease activity assessment visual analog scales tool (MYOACT): constitutional, cutaneous, skeletal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and cardiac. SIGLEC1 concentrations (ng/mL) were compared between patients with active and inactive diseases and those with and without AIM-specific manifestations using t-test. Results 87 AIM patients (32.2% male, median age 57.0±19 years) with dermatomyositis (DM, n=38), polymyositis (PM, n=7), antisynthetase syndrome (AS, n=2), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM, n=5), inclusion body myositis (IBM, n=10), overlap (n=20), and other myopathies (n=4) were included. Higher SIGLEC1 concentration differentiated active from inactive disease in AIM (mean difference 2.7 ng/mL, 95% CI 0.7-4.8, p<0.05) (Figure 1), and DM (mean difference 4.0 ng/mL, 95% CI 0.3-7.5, p<0.05). Higher SIGLEC1 concentrations were found among patients with cutaneous (mean difference 1.7 ng/mL, 95% CI 0.1-3.4), skeletal (mean difference 2.0 ng/mL, 95% CI 0.1-3.9), and gastrointestinal (mean difference 2.2 ng/mL, 95% CI 0.5-3.9) involvement compared to patients without these features. Figure 1 Serum SIGLEC1 levels in AIM patients separated by PGA score: active (PGA≥2) and inactive (PGA<2). Horizontal bars show median values; asterisks (**) represent significant results (p<0.01). T-test was used to compare groups. PGA, physician global assessment; SIGLEC1, sialic acid binding Ig-like lectin 1. Conclusion SIGLEC1 is a promising biomarker for assessing disease activity in AIM, particularly DM, and is associated with the presence of cutaneous, skeletal, and gastrointestinal clinical features. The candidacy of SIGLEC1 as a novel AIM biomarker requires further investigation and validation in a larger cohort of AIM patients. Future studies are underway to validate these findings and evaluate SIGLEC1 as a predictor of overall AIM disease activity during the course of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisFrench-language works237,207