MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Placental Abnormalities in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Novel Markers of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

2025· article· en· W4411885214 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kaitlin Nuechterlein, Luisa Ciofani, Popi Panaritis, Sasha Bernatsky, Évelyne Vinet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyChorioamnionitisPreeclampsiaObstetricsProspective cohort studyEtiologyGestationGestational agePlacentaFetusPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives Placenta-mediated adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) are a huge concern in SLE. Recent efforts to understand APO include the establishment of the 2016 Amsterdam classification criteria,[1] developed to standardize placental pathology evaluation. No study to date evaluated the Amsterdam criteria in SLE. Using the prospective “Lupus prEGnAnCY (LEGACY)” biobank, we assessed the relationship between placental abnormalities, lupus anticoagulant (LAC), and APO, applying the Amsterdam criteria. Methods LEGACY is a prospective cohort enrolling SLE pregnancies (before the 17th gestational week). Relevant information is collected at each trimester and/or end-of-pregnancy visits. We evaluated pregnancies delivered beyond 17 weeks at the Montreal site. Placental pathology was defined as abnormal if fulfilling at least 1of the 4 main Amsterdam classification subtypes: (1) maternal vascular malperfusion, (2) fetal vascular malperfusion, (3) acute chorioamnionitis, and/or (4) villitis of unknown etiology. Pregnancies with and without abnormal pathology were further characterized based on presence of LAC and APO (ie, stillbirth, placental insufficiency, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, small-for-gestational age neonate <5%). Results Of 44 LEGACY pregnancies delivered (beyond 17 weeks), 32 (73%) had placental pathology available. Among these 32, 15 (47%) had abnormal pathology. Of those with abnormal pathology, 6/15 (40%) had maternal vascular malperfusion, 5/15 (33%) acute chorioamnionitis, 4/15 (27%) villitis of unknown etiology, and 1/15 (7%) fetal vascular malperfusion. Mean gestational age at delivery was substantially lower in pregnancies with abnormal pathology [mean 33.7 weeks, standard deviation (SD) 6.8] versus those with normal pathology (mean 37.8 weeks, SD 1.7), with a difference in mean gestational age of −4.1 weeks (95% CI −0.6, −7.6). LAC was more frequent in pregnancies with abnormal pathology (4/15; 27%) as opposed to pregnancies with normal pathology (2/17; 12%). APO occurred in 8/15 (53%) pregnancies with abnormal pathology (including 3 with early preterm preeclampsia <34 weeks) as opposed to 7/17 (41%) pregnancies with normal pathology (none with early preterm preeclampsia). Maternal vascular malperfusion was strongly associated with APO (odds ratio 8.1; 95% CI 0.8, 83.7), although the CI included the null. Conclusion In this cross-sectional analysis, SLE pregnancies with abnormal placenta pathology, particularly maternal vascular malperfusion, experienced shorter gestation and more severe placenta-mediated APO, including early preterm preeclampsia. Future studies will aim to expand the sample and investigate if placental abnormalities in 1 pregnancy helps predict APO in subsequent pregnancies. [1.] Khong T. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140(7):698-713. Best Abstract on Basic Science Research by a Trainee Award. Supported by a CIORA grant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→