MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411885220 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0314.71

Phenotypic Spectrum of Adult Autoinflammatory Patients Carrying the MEFV E148Q Variant - A Case Series

2025· article· en· W4411885220 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jason An, Babak Aberumand, Mohammed Bassuony, Aoife Cox, Erika Lee, Elisabeth Pek, Jenny Shu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammasome and immune disorders
Canadian institutionsAllerGenThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentreOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkNorthern Ontario Academic Medicine AssociationCentre for Global Health ResearchToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMEFVMedicineFamilial Mediterranean feverInternal medicineDiseaseEpidemiologyArthritisDermatologyFamily historyGene mutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives To describe the phenotypic spectrum of adult autoinflammatory patients carrying the MEFV E148Q variant. Methods Patients were enrolled from an autoinflammatory clinic in Toronto. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, unexplained inflammatory features with genetic testing positive for the MEFV E148Q variant. Gene panel was performed at the Division of Genome Diagnostics, Hospital for Sick Children. All patients provided written consent to be included in a case series. Results Epidemiology: 17 patients were included (82% female). The most common ethnicities were Southeast Asian (35%), followed by South Asian (33%). The mean age was 39 years, and the mean age of disease onset was 22.6 years. Eight patients had a family history of similar symptoms. Clinical Features: Patients carried clinical labels such as Unclassified Systemic Autoinflammatory Disease or atypical FMF (both 5/17), FMF (3/17), PFAPA (2/17), and Behcet’s or Still’s disease (both 1/17). 10 patients experienced flares with intermittent wellness, and 7 had flares with chronic lingering symptoms. 9/17 identified triggers with stress and physical exertion being the most common. Recurrent fevers >38°C were present in 11 patients. The most common organ system affected was dermatologic (12/17 patients). Oral ulcers and urticaria-like lesions were the predominant manifestations. Neutrophilic infiltration was demonstrated in 2 out of 3 skin biopsies. Other manifestations included arthritis (11/17), gastrointestinal symptoms (10/17) and aseptic pharyngitis (7/17). CRP was elevated during inflammatory flares in 13/15, and even at baseline in 4/15 patients. Colchicine was effective in 13 out of 15 patients. Two were started on interleukin-1 inhibitor; both showed clinical and biochemical improvement. Genetic Architecture: 13/17 patients carried additional variants. The most common were MEFV, NLRP3, and NOD2. Exome sequencing was performed in 3 patients with no diagnostic results. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of patients gathered with the MEFV E148Q variant. While a minority of patients did not show signs of inflammasomopathy (eg, distinct flares/elevated CRP/response to colchicine), some exhibited these classic features of FMF. Some patients exhibited features unusual for FMF but appeared autoinflammatory in nature (eg, mucocutaneous ulcerations, hive-like lesions with neutrophilic dermatoses on biopsy) (Figure). These observations may suggest that E148Q is a low penetrance variant with variable expressivity,[1] and possibly associated with unique clinical features that fall outside the spectrum of classic FMF. Larger multicenter cohorts with exome sequencing and functional studies will be helpful in further elucidating the role of MEFV E148Q in patients presenting with autoinflammation. [1.] Gattorno M. Int J Mol Sci 2023:1-24.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicInflammasome and immune disordersFrench-language works237,207