Graphene–PLA Printed Sensor Combined with XR and the IoT for Enhanced Temperature Monitoring: A Case Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This case study aims to combine the advantage of the additive manufacturing of sensors with a mixed reality (MR) app, developed in a lab-scale workshop, to safely monitor and control the temperature of parts. Namely, the measurements were carried out in real time via a 3D-printed graphene–PLA nanocomposite sensor and communicated wirelessly using a low-power microcontroller with the IoT capability, and then transferred to the user display in the MR. In order to investigate the performance of the proposed computer-mediated reality, a user experience experiment (n = 8) was conducted. Statistical analysis results showed that the system leads to faster (>2.2 times) and more accurate (>82%) temperature control and monitoring by the users, as compared to the conventional technique using a thermal camera. Using a Holistic Presence Questionnaire (HPQ) scale, the users’ experience/training was significantly improved, while they reported less fatigue by 50%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it