Cell-specific mechanisms drive connectivity across the time course of Huntington’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperconnectivity in functional brain networks occurs decades before disease onset in Huntington's disease. However, the biological mechanisms remain unknown. We investigate connectivity in Huntington's disease using Morphometric INverse Divergence (MIND) in three Huntington's disease cohorts (N = 512) spanning from two decades before the onset of symptoms through to functional decline. Here, we identify stage-specific profiles, with hyperconnectivity 22 years from predicted motor onset, progressing to hypoconnectivity through the late premanifest and manifest stages, showing that hypoconnectivity is correlated with neurofilament light concentrations. To understand the biological mechanisms, we investigate associations with cortical organization principles including disease epicentres and cell-autonomous systems, in particular neurotransmitter distribution. The contribution from disease epicentres is limited to late premanifest while cell-autonomous associations are demonstrated across the Huntington's disease lifespan. Specific relationships to cholinergic and serotoninergic systems localized to granular and infragranular cortical layers are identified, consistent with serotoninergic layer 5a neuronal vulnerability previously identified in post-mortem brains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".