MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411887670 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-05652-3

Mining, validating, and quantifying circular RNA transcriptome from total RNA as a biomarker or target

2025· article· en· W4411887670 on OpenAlexafffund
Tan Ze Wang, Raj Kumar Thapa, Frank Yu, Ayesha Warsi, Kassie Rong, Tahereh Kashkoulinejad-Kouhi, Phyo W. Win, Christina A. Castellani, Tina Mele

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCircular RNAs in diseases
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTranscriptomeBiomarkerCircular RNARNAComputational biologyRNA-SeqBioinformaticsComputer scienceBiologyGene expressionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) participate in complex diseases and have emerged as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target. It is challenging to identify circRNAs from total RNA-seq data and to validate and quantify their levels by qRT-PCR. We sought to characterize the circRNA transcriptome from RNA-seq with total RNA from septic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), assess/compare commonly used aligners, and optimize validation methods, considering sepsis is the leading cause of death in intensive care units (ICU) and there is no effective treatment. PBMCs were isolated from sepsis patients before and after intensive care, and RNA sequencing was conducted with total RNA. RNA-seq data for circRNAs were analyzed using four pipelines. A circRNA transcriptome has been generated, and four alignment and annotation pipelines have been evaluated. TopHat was found to be the most sensitive aligner while MapSplice was found to be the most accurate. Overall, circRNA expression in septic PBMCs were found to be more abundant and less diverse at ICU admission (ICU-AD) compared with ICU discharge (ICU-DC). There were three differentially expressed circRNAs between ICU-AD and ICU-DC. The addition of reverse primers to a reverse transcription reaction improved reproducibility and accuracy of qRT-PCR. Among these altered circRNAs, two different isoforms of circular RNA from the ASPH gene (circASPH(2,4), and circASPH(2,3,4) with the same backsplicing junction (BSJ) were identified and specifically quantified by qRT-PCR. All the two isoforms were highly expressed at ICU-AD and circASPH(2,3,4) levels positively correlated with the length of stay in ICU. The circRNAs predictably bind to miR-670, miR-7975, miR-6818, and miR-384 and interact with proteins TLR2 and ZC3H12D. In conclusion, it is feasible to identify circRNA transcriptome from RNA-seq with total RNA. Moreover, RT-PCR followed by gel electrophoresis is important to identify/ distinguish a new isoform of a circRNA with the same BSJ. CircRNA transcriptome in septic PBMCs evolves as infectious severity changes. CircASPH(2,3,4) has a clinical potential as an indicator of disease severity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicCircular RNAs in diseasesFrench-language works237,207