High-gain UWB Fabry–Perot cavity antenna with dual-notched band for high-resolution imaging applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we propose an ultra-wideband (UWB) Fabry–Perot cavity (FPC) antenna with dual-notch (DN) bands, utilizing a partially reflective surface (PRS) as a superstrate and an artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) reflector to support and enhance a DN band UWB antenna. The antenna components work synergistically to improve gain and provide directional radiation characteristics, while effectively mitigating interference from 5G and WLAN signals in urban environment. The proposed FPC design is executed in two main steps. First, a planar monopole UWB antenna is designed to operate within the frequency range of 2.69 GHz–12.27 GHz, incorporating a DN at 5G-3.5 GHz and 5 GHz WLAN bands through a single-slotted electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) unit-cell placed near the feedline. Second, a 5 × 5 array of AMC reflector elements and a PRS are strategically placed at specific distances from the UWB antenna to increase the gain. The resulting FPC structure was designed, optimized in HFSS, fabricated, and experimentally validated. Both measured and simulated results confirm that the proposed FPC structure achieves a peak gain of 10.21 dBi at 8.8 GHz, highlighting its potential to address challenges in meeting UWB application requirements, including Radar systems dedicated to high-resolution infrastructure monitoring and microwave medical imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it