Relationalism: Geometric Model of Ceti f Orbital Duration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work advances a novel relationalistic proposal, a real-world signal constrained Euclidean modeling system that departs from conventional spacetime ontology, physics, or prior relationalistic proposals. Primative geometric elements of time—durations and temporal points—and of space—extensions and spatial points—are defined as relational magnitudes (one-dimensional) and locations (zero-dimensional) respectively. In rishta relationalism, primitive elements form from discrete relations—separate from measurement methods used to predict or quantify them. Using static symmetry, a dynamic system model uses static states of here and now for object and relational geometric element(s), without relying on spacetime, coordinates, or inertial frames. This article focuses on modeling a canonical object-oriented duration (orbital period of Ceti f) using a known measurant duration (Earth’s orbital period) by scaling selected length elements and pairing with temporal elements quantified by modern physics to generate novel spatiotemporal elements. The resulting model is measurable with standard units. Unique spatiotemporal elements, partitioned into units, introduces a novel application for Euclidean translation in relationalism. Rishta relationalism captures primitive metrics in the shared “now,” using a synchronized, omniscient view of an omnipresent universe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".