MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411902954 · doi:10.21070/acopen.10.2025.10476

Improving the Organizational Mechanisms of Domestic Tourism in The Socio-Economic Development of Regions as an Important Factor in Preserving the Environment

2025· article· en· W4411902954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Firuz Fakhritdinovich Zokhidov

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademia Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSharing Economy and Platforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismFactor (programming language)BusinessEconomic geographyGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the improvement of organizational mechanisms for domestic tourism in the socio-economic development of the regions of the Republic of Uzbekistan. It substantiates that organizing this process is an important factor in preserving the environment. In organizing these processes, international experience, legislation, and applied methods have been thoroughly studied. Recommendations are provided regarding improving the organizational mechanisms of domestic tourism in the regions of the Republic of Uzbekistan and preserving the environment. Highlights: Domestic tourism boosts socio-economic development in Uzbekistan regions. Environmental preservation requires effective tourism management and organization. International experience, laws, and methods improve tourism mechanisms. Key words: the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) introduced the ISO 14001 (EMS), in England, the BS 7750 Specification for Environmental Management Systems; in Canada, CAN/CSA Z750-94: Guidelines for an Environmental Management System; in the EU, EMAS; and the international “European Center of Ecological and Agrotourism” (ECEAT). ECEAT, “European Center of Ecological and Agrotourism” (ECEAT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademia OpenSame topicSharing Economy and PlatformsFrench-language works237,207