Observer‐Based Adaptive Robust Control of Dual‐Layer Multiagent Epidemic Model: Physical and Information Layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper proposes an innovative dual‐layer multi‐agent‐based SIS epidemic model, incorporating a physical contact layer to model disease spread through travel or migration between cities, and an information layer to enable the sharing of infection data among healthcare providers across cities even without direct physical connections. An observer is designed to estimate the infected fraction in each city, utilising estimates from neighbouring cities connected in the physical layer in a distributed manner; these estimates are then leveraged in the information layer to synchronise each city's infection trajectory with a virtual leader. Additionally, the control input, typically formulated in multi‐agent systems (MAS), is adopted as the sliding surface, with its stability demonstrated via Lyapunov analysis within the dual‐layer SIS framework. An adaptive sliding mode control (ASMC) strategy is developed to address parameter uncertainties to reach this sliding surface, effectively integrating the physical and information layers’ dynamics to drive cities toward disease eradication. Finally, a numerical example is provided to validate the accuracy of the theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".