MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411921217 · doi:10.1016/j.jos.2025.05.014

Current status of patients with hip fracture in Japan: A nationwide survey

2025· article· en· W4411921217 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsOsteoporosis Canada
FundersJapanese Orthopaedic Association
KeywordsMedicineHip fractureInternal medicineOrthopedic surgeryRheumatologyPhysical therapySurgeryOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although surgical treatment is the standard of care for most hip fractures, the post-fracture management of osteoporosis remains challenging. This study aimed to elucidate the status of osteoporosis treatment, subsequent fracture rates, mortality rates, and changes in residential status and care levels among hip fracture patients in Japan, and to explore strategies for fracture prevention and extension of healthy life expectancy. METHODS: This study included patients with hip fractures treated at approximately 3000 orthopaedic facilities nationwide during July 2020. Data was collected via web-based surveys at the time of injury and 6 and 12 months post-injury. RESULTS: A total of 6705 patients were registered from 1309 facilities (mean age: 82.9 ± 0.7 years; 86.4 % were female). The surgery rate was 94.8 %, with 62.1 % undergoing osteosynthesis and 37.9 % receiving hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. Osteoporosis treatment rates gradually increased from 23.0 % at the time of injury to 44.8 % at 6 months and 47.3 % at 12 months, although the rates remained suboptimal. Active vitamin D3-based medications were the most commonly used medications, accounting for approximately 60 % of cases. The cumulative 12-month mortality rate was 10.0 %, and the incidence of new fractures was 11.0 %. The main fracture sites were the contralateral proximal femur, vertebral, and proximal humerus. The most common reason for non-treatment was "patient's decision." Among patients who were not enrolled in long-term care insurance at the time of injury, 66.1 % had newly obtained care level certification by 12 months after injury. The proportion of patients who returned home among those living at home at the time of injury was 80.7 % at 6 months and 96.8 % at 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis treatment rates after hip fractures remain low, indicating the need for more proactive intervention, including secondary fracture prevention. This study also highlights the importance of early rehabilitation and continuous support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it