Medication Utilization at a Provincial Remand Centre.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of medication utilization highlights health needs and facilitates rational drug use in a population. Data on medication utilization in correctional facilities are limited. Objective: To describe the types and volumes of medications used at a provincial remand centre, by drug schedule and therapeutic classification. Methods: test. Results: Of 8772 persons admitted to the remand centre during the study period, 6296 (71.8%) had medication orders. Of these, 5446 (86.5%) had orders for over-the-counter medications, 5591 (88.8%) for prescription medications, and 2513 (39.9%) for narcotics. Patients 40 years of age or younger had proportionally more orders for narcotic medications. The therapeutic classes with the highest proportions of patients were those for treating mental health problems, substance use disorder, pain, constipation, and infectious diseases. Conclusions: Most patients in this corrections facility were receiving medications. Utilization trends specific to the corrections setting should be considered to support patient care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it