Bibliographic record
Abstract
1En nous invitant, dans son rcent ouvrage, couter la bande dessine , Benot Glaude prend d'emble le contrepied d'un clich durable : l'ide selon laquelle la bande dessine serait un mdia essentiellement et exclusivement visuel.voquant les multiples pratiques sonores qui la concernent depuis fort longtemps, telles les lectures voix haute de l'enfance, l'auteur procde un double dcentrement : il souligne premirement la multisensorialit de la bande dessine, c'est--dire le fait que sa consommation engage l'oue, le toucher, voire mme le got (par synesthsie mais aussi au sens propre, dans ses rceptions pragmatiques), et deuximement son intermdialit, puisqu'historiquement elle s'est trouve associe une pluralit d'objets et de mdias (tlphone, phonographe, magazine, radio, disque, film fixe, tlvision) qui ont dfini une culture partage de la modernit sonore 1 au sein de laquelle la bande dessine a t lue, raconte, adapte, commente, performe, chante ou joue.Le livre se concentre en effet sur les mises en voix c'est--dire les formes vocales de sonorisation de la bande dessine et dploie une histoire culturelle et matrielle allant des annes 1930 aujourd'hui, partir d'exemples tirs du corpus franco-belge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".