MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411929627 · doi:10.9790/9622-1506139144

A Parallel AI Framework for Autonomous Microgrid Control in Aerospace Systems Application Potential for NASA and the Canadian Space Agency for Deep Neural Control Module (DNCM)

2025· article· en· W4411929627 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engineering Research and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerospaceAgency (philosophy)Control (management)Computer scienceMicrogridSpace (punctuation)Artificial neural networkControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl systemAeronauticsAerospace engineeringSystems engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringOperating systemSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advancements in space exploration platforms, such as NASA’s Artemis lunar base program and the Canadian Space Agency’s Gateway power systems, demand resilient, autonomous, and intelligent energy control solutions. These systems operate in dynamic, resource-constrained, and fault-prone environments where traditional SCADA or PLC-based controls lack adaptability and predictive capability. This paper presents HIRACLE—Hybrid Intelligent Resilient Adaptive Control and Learning Engine—a novel parallel AI framework specifically designed for microgrid systems in extraterrestrial habitats and highaltitude UAV missions. HIRACLE features a modular, edge-deployable architecture combining transformer-based forecasting, deep reinforcement learning, spiking neural fault detection, and graph-based rerouting, all supported by meta-learning for continuous mission adaptation. The software implementation utilizes containerized deep learning models (TensorFlow/PyTorch) optimized for edge inference using platforms such as NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin and Xilinx Versal AI Edge SoCs. These models are deployed as distributed agents capable of parallel operation via high-speed buses (CAN-FD, SpaceWire), ensuring real-time coordination across subsystems. Fault classification, ripple anticipation, load optimization, and health-aware scheduling are executed concurrently without centralized computation. On the hardware front, HIRACLE integrates reconfigurable logic (FPGAs), neuromorphic processors (Intel Loihi 2), SiC-based power conditioning units, and secure telemetry interfaces into a ruggedized control environment. A new chip-level proposal—HIRACLE-IC—is introduced, consolidating all AI, logic, sensing, and secure communication into a single embedded platform ready for deployment in lunar, Martian, or stratospheric UAV energy systems. This approach not only surpasses existing state-of-the-art autonomous energy controls but also positions HIRACLE as a foundational control paradigm for future NASA and CSA missions requiring scalable, intelligent, and mission-adaptive microgrid autonomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it