Relier la complexité : un modèle pédagogique métapoïètique [note de lecture] : Vieille-Grosjean, H. et Prignot, P. (2024). Vers une pédagogie de la reliance en éducation avec Möbius et Morin. L’Harmattan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans Vers une pédagogie de la reliance en éducation avec Möbius et Morin, publié en 2024, Henri Vieille-Grosjean et Patrick Prignot proposent une réflexion philosophique sur l’application des concepts du ruban de Möbius et de la notion de reliance d’Edgar Morin à la pédagogie. Les auteurs soulignent que la figure de Möbius illustre l’interconnexion circulaire et continue des divers éléments d’un phénomène social, où les frontières entre début et fin deviennent floues. Les concepts du ruban de Möbius et de la reliance de Morin sont utilisés comme des métaphores permettant d’explorer la complexité des dynamiques éducatives, qui peuvent se révéler à la fois complémentaires et paradoxales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".