MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411930273 · doi:10.1063/5.0265401

Effects of freestream turbulence intensity on flow dynamics and vortical structures around a high-drag Ahmed body

2025· article· en· W4411930273 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir Sagharichi, Mark F. Tachie

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsFreestreamDragTurbulenceMechanicsClassical mechanicsReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the effects of freestream turbulence (FST) on the spatiotemporal flow dynamics around an Ahmed body with a slanted angle of β = 25° using time-resolved particle image velocimetry. Three FST intensities (Tu = 5.0%, 10.0%, and 15.0%) were generated using regular and fractal grids, and the results were compared with those obtained at a baseline turbulence level of Tu = 1.5% achieved in the absence of the grids. The size of the roof recirculation bubble decreased monotonically with increasing FST; however, the wake bubble size is independent of FST. Over the slanted surface, the bubble size increased with FST for Tu ≤ 10.0% and remained constant at Tu = 15.0%. The increase in the bubble size was attributed to a stronger spatial and temporal correlation between the C-pillar vortex and the separated shear layer from the slanted surface. FST also promotes turbulence transition by generating elongated streaks characterized by higher streamwise than wall-normal velocity fluctuations. The results also show that FST suppresses the magnitudes of Reynolds stresses over the roof and in the wake region and has no significant effects on the turbulence levels over the slanted surface. The spatiotemporal features were analyzed using velocity spectra and two-point spatial and space–time correlation coefficients, while spectral proper orthogonal decomposition was used to study vortical structures linked to dynamically important frequencies. FST suppressed the dynamically important frequencies of the vortical structure, including roof bubble pulsation, disrupted the flapping motion of recirculation bubbles in the wake, and reduced their spectral coherence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207