MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411933070 · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2025.06.076

A comprehensive study of geomagnetic and TEC disturbances in relation to M  <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si9.svg"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⩾</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math>  5.0 earthquakes

2025· article· lv· W4411933070 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Space Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCommission Géologique du CanadaNational Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKyushu UniversityU.S. Geological SurveyUniversitetet i TromsøMinistry of Higher Education, MalaysiaFlorida Institute of Technology
KeywordsTECRelation (database)Earth's magnetic fieldComputer sciencePhysicsData miningGeophysicsIonosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have demonstrated the interaction between multiple layers of the Earth and seismic activity, specifically the lithosphere - atmosphere – ionosphere (LAI) coupling, which is the focus of the present study. Anomalies in LAI parameters, such as variations in geomagnetic field and total electron content (TEC) before seismic activity, have been regarded as earthquake precursors by previous researchers. However, earlier studies used only single parameters and had a limited number of case studies. This study aimed to investigate pre-earthquake anomalies using a multi-parameter approach. Geomagnetic field and TEC variations were used to investigate the relationship between the Earth’s layers and earthquakes. Utilising global geomagnetic data and TEC data, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on the variations of geomagnetic and TEC data for the 60 days preceding and five (5) days following the occurrences of the 694 earthquakes with magnitudes greater than and equal to 5.0 (M ⩾ 5.0) in the Japan region in 2011. Following the exclusion of days with geomagnetic storms, referred to as disturbed days, this investigation focused solely on undisturbed days. This study explored and compared geomagnetic and ionospheric disturbances during these undisturbed days preceding the earthquakes. Both geomagnetic and TEC precursors were significantly found in moderate and shallow earthquakes. It was revealed that, preceding the studied earthquake events, anomalous behaviours were evident in both geomagnetic and TEC variations, and these behaviours persisted even on undisturbed days. The study also observed that anomalous TEC parameters occurred within the same time frame as the geomagnetic anomalies, and they were found to be detected a month before the earthquakes. The occurrence rate of the geomagnetic precursors was higher of 65 % , than that of the TEC precursors of 11 % . These observations suggest that the preparation process for earthquakes could impact the ground and upper atmosphere, as described by the LAI coupling mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it