Analysis of an engineered organoid model of pancreatic cancer identifies hypoxia as a contributing factor in determining transcriptional subtypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a high-mortality cancer characterized by its aggressive, treatment-resistant phenotype and a complex tumour microenvironment (TME) featuring significant hypoxia. Bulk transcriptomic analysis has identified the "classical" and "basal-like" transcriptional subtypes which have prognostic value; however, it is not well-established how microenvironmental heterogeneity contributes to these transcriptional signatures. Here, we exploited the TRACER platform to perform single cell transcriptome analysis of organoids at specific spatial locations to explore the effect of oxygen and other cell-generated microenvironmental gradients on organoid heterogeneity. We found that the microenvironmental gradients present in TRACER significantly impact the distribution of organoid transcriptional phenotypes and the enrichment of gene sets linked to cancer progression and treatment resistance. More significantly, we found that microenvironmental gradients, predominantly oxygen, drive changes in the expression of classical and basal-like transcriptional subtype gene signatures. This work suggests that hypoxia contributes to determining transcriptional subtypes in PDAC tumour cells independent of additional cells in the TME and broadly highlights the importance of considering microenvironmental gradients such as oxygen in organoid-based studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".