MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411936700 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2024-0265

Ultra-high-performance concrete decked I-beam for medium- and long-span bridges

2025· article· en· W4411936700 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
George Morcous, Antony Kodsy, Maher K. Tadros

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNebraska Department of Transportation
KeywordsSpan (engineering)Structural engineeringBeam (structure)EngineeringBridge (graph theory)Precast concreteMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is an excellent material for bridge construction due to its superior workability, durability, and mechanical properties. This paper presents the development of an innovative UHPC superstructure system for medium- and long-span bridges. The new system consists of decked I-beams (DIBs) designed to optimize superstructure weight, speed of construction, structural efficiency, and durability. A nonproprietary UHPC mixture was developed, and a special form was manufactured to produce DIBs with ribbed slabs. Several material/structural tests were conducted on small-scale specimens and two full-scale specimens to evaluate flexural strength and punching shear strength of the ribbed deck slab as well as load distribution in the DIB flanges. The challenges associated with the production of two full-scale specimens using the new nonproprietary UHPC mixture and DIB forms are discussed. Test results indicated the adequacy of the developed system when compared to the demand of an example bridge and the predicted capacity according to AASHTO UHPC Guide Specifications and PCI Design Guide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207