MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411937192 · doi:10.1152/physiol.00012.2025

The Physiology behind the Epidemiology of Heat-Related Health Impacts

2025· review· en· W4411937192 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Gagnon, Zachary J. Schlader, Ollie Jay

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNational Health and Medical Research Council
KeywordsHeatstrokeHeat illnessContext (archaeology)EpidemiologyMedicineExtreme heatHeat exhaustionAdverse effectEnvironmental healthHeat waveIntensive care medicinePoison controlClimate changeBiologyPathologyInternal medicineEcologyMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A direct consequence of climate change is the intensification of hot weather and extreme heat events that are epidemiologically associated with a greater risk of heat-related illnesses and other adverse health outcomes, often resulting in subsequent hospital admissions and mortality. The health risks associated with hot weather directly arise from the body's physiological responses (i.e., heat strain) to heat exposure. The magnitude of heat strain experienced and the extent of heat strain required to cause an adverse health outcome can be modulated by personal characteristics and the adoption of protective behaviors. This review presents the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the epidemiological association between heat exposure and a greater risk of heat illnesses (e.g., heat exhaustion, heatstroke), adverse cardiovascular events, and acute kidney injury or failure. These mechanisms are framed within the larger context that defines heat-related health risks, and we provide examples and perspectives of how physiologists are uniquely positioned to contribute to risk reduction and adaptation efforts to protect humans against the adverse health impacts of heat, while maintaining optimum well-being and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207