MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411937622 · doi:10.48048/tis.2025.9855

Mitigating Corrosion in Downhole Environments of Oil and Gas Operations: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Control Strategies

2025· article· en· W4411937622 on OpenAlex
Ezz Ahmed, Jianguo Liu, Jing Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsCorrosionPetroleum engineeringControl (management)Fossil fuelEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringWaste managementMaterials scienceMetallurgyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As oil and gas exploration and production extend into deeper and more challenging environments, the prevalence of acid gases in high-temperature, high-pressure conditions intensifies corrosion risks. This review examines corrosion mechanisms in downhole environments, focusing on the impact of CO2, H2S, and O2, as well as key forms of degradation, including pitting, crevice, under-deposit, stress corrosion cracking, and erosion-corrosion. Corrosion control strategies such as inhibitors, surface coatings, and material selection are analyzed, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations. Additionally, the role of advanced dissolvable tools in enhancing operational efficiency and reducing post-fracture cleanup, their controlled corrosion mechanism, and application case studies are discussed. Despite significant progress, gaps remain in understanding gas interactions, corrosion behavior in extreme conditions, and the long-term performance of mitigation strategies. Future research should focus on refining corrosion prediction models, optimizing material performance, and evaluating economic feasibility, development, and practical use of advanced technologies to ensure reliable and cost-effective downhole operations. HIGHLIGHTS Comprehensive analysis of corrosive gases, exploring the distinct roles of CO2, H2S, and O2 in influencing corrosion mechanisms in downhole environments, with an emphasis on the impact of environmental factors on alloy corrosion. Detailed examination of pitting, crevice, under-deposit, stress corrosion cracking, and erosion-corrosion as they pertain to oilfield conditions. Corrosion control techniques and their effectiveness in mitigating corrosion through corrosion inhibition, surface coatings, and materials selection for managing corrosion in complex downhole scenarios Advanced dissolvable tools, a desired type of corrosion in downhole wells, demonstrating how they improve well efficiency by eliminating milling, reducing downtime, and lowering intervention costs. Additionally, discussing their corrosion mechanism, and economic benefits, as well as providing case studies. A summary of a wide range of corrosion data of different types of alloys under downhole settings. Suggested future research direction in eco-friendly inhibitors, smart coatings, optimized alloys, and AI-driven predictive model to enhance reliability, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness in downhole environments. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it