MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411938287 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v17n8p24

Analysis of Co-Movements in Ecowas Financial Markets of Oil Importing and Exporting Countries and the Price of Brent: A Wavelet Approach

2025· article· en· W4411938287 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
PRAO Yao Séraphin, Anzian Kouamé Marcel, Djeban Koffi Mouroufie Emmanuel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletEconomicsOil priceInternational economicsBrent CrudeFinancial systemBusinessFinancial economicsMonetary economicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effects of contagion, interdependence, and changes in the correlation structure, after the COVID-19 crisis, on the financial markets of the ECOWAS oil importing and exporting area and the price of BRENT. To do this, two wavelet approaches in a time-frequency domain (the local correlation wavelet (WLC) and the correlation wavelet (WC)), on daily data from January 04, 2005, to January 06, 2022, of the composite indices of the NSE, the BRVM, the GSE and the price of BRENT, are mobilized. The results mainly reveal the existence of contagion and co-movement on the one hand, and variation in the correlation structure in the post-COVID-19 era on the other. The study thus exhibits evidence of the coexistence of contagion, co-movement, and permanent change in the correlation structure between the ECOWAS financial markets and the price of BRENT before and after the COVID-19 crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance→Same topicMarket Dynamics and Volatility→French-language works237,207→