MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411941060 · doi:10.51298/vmj.v551i3.14764

ĐÁNH GIÁ KẾT QUẢ SỬ DỤNG GHIM DA ĐẦU TRONG PHẪU THUẬT SỌ NÃO TẠI BỆNH VIỆN ĐẠI HỌC Y HÀ NỘI

2025· article· vi· W4411941060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hiền Nguyễn Thị, Kiên Trần Trung

Bibliographic record

VenueTạp chí Y học Việt Nam · 2025
Typearticle
Languagevi
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicResearch studies in Vietnam
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mục tiêu: Đánh giá kết quả sử dụng ghim da đầu trong phẫu thuật sọ não tại bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Đối tượng và phương pháp nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu mô tả bệnh nhân phẫu thuật sọ não được sử dụng ghim da đầu tại bệnh viện Đại học Y tháng 01/2024 đến 01/2025. Kết quả: Tỷ lệ bệnh nhân nam/ nữ là 1,2/1, Kanoffsy trung bình là 84,3 ± 10, đánh giá sẹo mổ sau 1 tháng theo thang điểm Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), điểm trung bình của 70 bệnh nhân là 2.5, liền sẹo tốt chiếm 88,6%, liền sẹo trung bình 12,4%, không có trường hợp nào liền sẹo xấu. Kết luận: Ghim da đầu là phương phương pháp hiệu quả, an toàn với tỷ lệ liền sẹo tốt cao.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTạp chí Y học Việt NamSame topicResearch studies in VietnamFrench-language works237,207