Near-orthogonal, natural hydraulic opening-mode fractures in a compressive setting as conduits for gas expulsion from shales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Natural hydraulic opening-mode fractures are widespread in low-permeability organic-rich shales and could serve as preferred conduits for fluid migration during hydrocarbon generation. However, in response to fluid overpressure under a certain stress regime, the fracturing of differentially oriented sets and how they cooperated to affect hydrocarbon migration are still uncertain. Here we present an illustrative example by studying formation of a near-orthogonal fracture network—comprising both bedding-parallel and bedding-normal, natural hydraulic opening-mode fractures in organic-rich Wufeng-Longmaxi shales in northeastern Sichuan foreland basin, China. Through analyses of fracture petrography, cementation, and fluid inclusions combined with basin modeling and hydrocarbon maturation, we provide evidence for a broadly simultaneous formation of the two near-orthogonal fracture sets driven by the combined effect of compressive tectonic stress and super-lithostatic pore fluid overpressure. Such extreme overpressure was recorded by monophase CH4 inclusions, which were trapped throughout the synkinematic, broadly simultaneous blocky cementation in both sets during the gas generation stage. The required local, coeval horizontal compressive conditions that enabled the broadly simultaneous opening of the near-orthogonal sets are compatible with the regional tectonic regime in the northeastern basin at the time. This regime was characterized by near-orthogonal compression resulting from the southwestward expansion of the Dabashan fold-thrust belt and coeval northwestward propagation of the Xuefengshan fold-thrust belt. Thus, during cementation with super-lithostatic overpressure, the permeable space kept widening within both fractures and new hydro-fracturing proceeded at the tips. Such hydraulic opening-mode fracturing in a tectonic compressive regime would promote enhanced permeability and connectivity, and propagate the flow conduit system in all directions for accelerating gas expulsion from shales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".