MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantum-Aided Active User Detection for Energy-Efficient CD-NOMA in Cognitive Radio Networks

2025· article· en· W4411948981 on OpenAlexaff
Deemah H. Tashman, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomaCognitive radioComputer scienceComputer networkTelecommunicationsWirelessTelecommunications link

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution towards 6G networks promises a massive increase in connected devices and demanding use cases, intensifying the challenge of managing limited spectrum resources efficiently. This paper addresses this challenge in an underlay cognitive radio network framework where secondary users (SUs) employ the code domain non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) mechanism for communication while incorporate energy harvesting (EH) to enhance their operational longevity and support green communication principles. Specifically, we assume SUs utilize EH via a wireless powered communication network (WPCN) process. A difficulty within this combined cognitive radio and WPCN scenario is the precise and efficient identification of active SUs for effective resource allocation and interference management. While traditional active user identification methods exist, they can face challenges, including computational complexity and experiencing limitations in accuracy under certain conditions. To address this issues we proposes the application of Grover’s quantum search technique. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of the number of users on the detection success probability and the trade-off between this probability and energy efficiency in this scenario. A comparison between the proposed approach and a non-quantum search technique is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207