Evaluating Real-Time Object Detection Models for Autonomous Vehicular Vision applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advancements in autonomous vehicle technology depend on the development of object detection systems that efficiently balance speed and accuracy. This study evaluates real-time object detection models, with an emphasis on all YOLO kinds from v1 to v10. It draws attention to significant enhancements in accuracy and speed, remarkably with YOLOv9 and YOLOv10, which triumph a high Mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.98, surpassing earlier YOLO versions and opposing algorithms. We reveal that YOLOv10 stands out for its finest trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency, making it a powerful nominee for autonomous vehicle applications. The paper highlights the worth of picking the suitable model based on the specific requirements of the vehicle system. By utilizing extensive datasets such as Berkeley DeepDrive 100K and VisDrone, we prove that YOLOv10 can detect crucial road objects, including vehicles, traffic signs, and pedestrians, training the model for real-world deployment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".