Confidence: A Web App for Cross-Platform Differential Gene Expression Analysis, Gene Scoring, and Enrichment Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is used to quantify transcript levels through measurement of nucleotide sequences. To evaluate statistically significant changes in gene expression, transcript counts between samples are compared using differential expression analysis methods. However, three of the most pressing challenges in transcriptomics analyses are: 1) analytical packages produce a distinct number of differentially expressed genes with varied P -value and fold-change values; 2) the effective use of these analytical packages requires substantial knowledge of programming and bioinformatics; and 3) there are a lack of intuitive methods to select target genes for further investigation in an unbiased manner. To address these challenges, we developed Confidence, a web-based application to perform simultaneous statistical analysis of RNA-seq count data. Confidence incorporates the Confidence Score (CS), ranging from 1 to 4 to aid in gene prioritization, where 1 represents low confidence and 4 represents high confidence. The Confidence web-based application was designed for rapid and intuitive analysis of standard experimental metadata and gene count inputs. Confidence provided a web-based, ‘wide-net’ approach to differential gene expression analysis. Gene scoring allows for unbiased gene selection and identification of novel genes strongly associated with disease and treatment models across multiple species. Additionally, pathway analysis tools have been integrated so that highly confident genes can be placed into biological context in terms of functions and pathways. Confidence provides a new strategy for target prioritization in RNA-seq analysis and the generation of publication-quality figures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.076 | 0.039 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".