MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411959153 · doi:10.59236/td2009vol3iss2953

Clarifying the Constructs of Motivation, Regulation of Motivation, and Volition in Models of Self-Regulated Learning

2009· article· en· W4411959153 on OpenAlexaff
Bob Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueTransformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolition (linguistics)PsychologyCognitive psychologyIntrinsic motivationSelf-regulated learningSelf-determination theorySocial psychologyCognitive scienceAutonomyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Models of self-regulated learning emphasize that students are more effective when they are motivated to become self-directed learners.However, the terms motivation, regulation of motivation, and volition are sometimes used interchangeably in the selfregulated learning literature.The purpose of this article is to explore the theoretical boundaries and overlaps between these constructs.Conceptual clarity of these important constructs is the important first step to guide future research related to the theoretical definition, measurement, development, and instruction of strategies for selfregulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.016
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning JournalSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207