MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411962702 · doi:10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100291

A FIRST-IN-HUMAN PHASE 1/2A CLINICAL STUDY OF ICM-203 AAV GENE THERAPY: PROMISING SIGNALS AS A DMOAD CANDIDATE

2025· article· en· W4411962702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alison Heald, Lucian B. Solomon, Richard S. Page, Young Na Yum, Min‐Chul Park, John Collins, A. Guermazi, Dongwook Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueOsteoarthritis Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetic enhancementPhase (matter)MedicineComputational biologyGeneBiologyGeneticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION ICM-203, a recombinant AAV vector designed to express a truncated form of human Nkx3.2, a transcription factor which plays an important role in both chondrocyte and synoviocyte activity, is in clinical development as a potential DMOAD. OBJECTIVE An unblinded interim analysis of the low dose cohort of the first-in-human phase 1/2a study of ICM-203 was conducted to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and biological activity of ICM-203. METHODS In the low dose cohort of this phase 1/2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study (NCT04875754), 8 subjects with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were randomized to receive a single intra-articular injection of ICM-203 or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. The primary safety endpoint was safety and tolerability of ICM-203 through assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Immunogenicity endpoints included measuring serum neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers and T-cell responses to ICM-203’s AAV capsid. As efficacy endpoints, changes in knee pain and function were assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain subscale and KOOS activities of daily living (ADL) subscale, respectively; these KOOS scores were converted to calculate Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. Imaging endpoints included Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Osteoarthritis Knee Scores (MOAKS) focusing on bone marrow lesions (BML), synovitis, articular cartilage damage, and osteophytes. RESULTS Of 11 screened subjects, 8 qualified and received a single intra-articular injection of ICM-203 (N=6) or placebo (N=2); all subjects completed 52 weeks of follow-up. Subject age ranged from 56 to 73 years; body mass index (BMI) ranged from 24.6 to 38.6 kg/m2. No significant concerns about safety or tolerability arose. The most common treatment-related TEAE was mild to moderate arthralgia, which occurred in 3 of 6 ICM-203 subjects and 1 of 2 placebo subjects. At baseline, 3 ICM-203 subjects had positive NAb responses to AAV capsid; no subjects had significant T-cell responses. All 6 ICM-203 subjects developed both a humoral and cellular response against AAV capsid, whereas neither placebo subject did. ICM-203 subjects with negative NAb at baseline (N=3) demonstrated greater improvement over placebo subjects (N=2) in KOOS pain, KOOS ADL, WOMAC, as well as in imaging endpoints, including MOAKS BML and synovitis. For articular cartilage and osteophytes, no significant changes were observed in any subject between baseline and week 52. CONCLUSION Intra-articular injections of ICM-203 were safe and well tolerated. ICM-203 appeared to show greater therapeutic activity over placebo in subjects with negative NAb at baseline. Current findings indicate ICM-203 may demonstrate potential as a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD), between reducing osteoarthritis symptoms, ameliorating structural joint damage, and alleviating synovial inflammation. Investigation of higher doses of ICM-203 is in progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsteoarthritis ImagingSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207