MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411962755 · doi:10.1016/j.ostima.2025.100299

REGIONAL VARIATION IN TRAPEZIOMETACARPAL BONE MICROARCHITECTURE IN FEMALES WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS USING HR-PQCT

2025· article· en· W4411962755 on OpenAlexaff
Michael T. Kuczynski, Charley Hasselaar, Gurpreet Dhaliwal, Christina Hiscox, Neil J. White, Sarah L. Manske

Bibliographic record

VenueOsteoarthritis Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisSubchondral boneMedicineMicroarchitectureComputer sciencePathologyArticular cartilage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION The trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint, comprised of the trapezium (TRP) and first metacarpal (MC1) bones, is a mechanically complex, saddle-shaped joint. Studies have estimated that the peak forces acting on the TMC joint are up to five times higher than the corresponding external forces [1]. Moreover, cadaveric studies have shown non-uniform cartilage loss in TMC joint with OA [2]. While several cadaveric studies have investigated TMC joint cartilage and bone changes, evaluation of subchondral bone changes in the TMC joint in vivo is lacking. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate differences in bone microarchitecture in anatomical quadrants of the TMC joint in women with TMC OA compared to age- and sex-matched controls. We hypothesized that women with TMC OA will exhibit quadrant-specific differences in bone microarchitecture compared to controls. Specifically, we hypothesized that the volar region of the TMC joint will demonstrate an increase in trabecular thickness, bone volume, and volumetric bone mineral density due to localized bone adaptations as a response to increased loading in the volar region. METHODS 14 females diagnosed with symptomatic TMC OA (mean age: 60 ± 6.5 years) and 12 similarly aged female controls (mean age: 59 ± 5.7 years) were scanned using HR-pQCT (XtremeCT2, Scanco Medical). A standard HR-pQCT scanning protocol was used (61 µm 3 voxels). Images were preprocessed using a Laplace-Hamming filter and segmented with a fixed threshold (15% of the maximum intensity). A bone coordinate system was automatically defined for the MC1 and TRP [3], and used to separate each bone into four anatomical quadrants: 1) radial-dorsal (RD), 2) radial-volar (RV), 3) ulnar-dorsal (UD), and 4) ulnar-volar (UV). For each whole bone and quadrant, we computed volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD, mg HA/cm 3 ), bone volume fraction (BV/TV, %), and bone thickness (B.Th, mm). A mixed ANOVA was used to compare bone measures in each bone and quadrant between groups. RESULTS We did not observe a significant difference in total bone parameters between groups for the MC1 or TRP. However, we found a statistically significant interaction effect between the volar and dorsal quadrants of the TRP and group for B.Th (p = 0.02, Figure 1, Table 1). Compared to controls, the mean B.Th in the TRP of the OA group was 1.9% lower in the RD quadrant, 7.5% lower in the UD quadrant, 4.8% greater in the RV quadrant, and 6.2% greater in the UV quadrant. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that whole bone TMC microarchitecture may not differ between OA and controls; however, we found significant differences in quadrant bone microarchitecture. This suggests that the MC1 and TRP undergo localized bone microarchitectural changes to adapt to the loading of the TMC joint. Further, our results suggest that bone thickness in the volar region of the trapezium may increase with TMC OA. The TMC joint ligaments aid in distributing forces in the joint, which can be affected in TMC OA. Koff et al . found thinner cartilage in the volar region of the TMC joint in OA, which may be attributed to increased loads [2]. In this study, bones were not further subdivided into trabecular and cortical regions as the trapezium does not have a clear separation between these regions. Combined with the small sample size, this may explain the lack of significance in vBMD and BV/TV between groups. Subchondral sclerotic bone was 50% thicker in cadaveric trapezia with OA [4]. Thus, developing an algorithm to reliably separate these regions in the trapezium may provide further insights into regional effects of TMC OA on cortical and trabecular bone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsteoarthritis ImagingSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207