Effect of cold plasma processing on the immunoreactivity, structure and functional properties of peanut protein
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peanuts are one of the most important food allergens globally. To reduce the risk of allergies, peanuts were treated with cold plasma (CP) for varying durations. The impact of CP on the immunoreactivity, structure, and functional properties of peanut protein (PP) was investigated, aiming to comprehensively evaluate the influence of CP on PP. The results showed that following a 25-min CP treatment, the immunoreactivity of PP decreased by 69%, with improved digestibility. The analysis of the secondary structure demonstrated a reduction of 2.32% in α -helix and 1.54% in random coil, accompanied by an increase of 4.12% in β -sheet. This result indicated the disruption of the secondary structure in protein. Furthermore, the decrease in the intensity of intrinsic fluorescence, coupled with the rise in UV and extrinsic fluorescence, represented the fluorescence quenching of Trp and the exposure of hydrophobic groups. These alterations in structure, caused by the oxidation of CP, were postulated as potential contributors to the diminished immunoreactivity of PP. In addition, these structural modifications could augment the degree of adsorption at the air-water interface, resulting in a notable enhancement in the foaming capability of PP (from 152% to 213%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it