MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411968329 · doi:10.1186/s42408-025-00382-3

Has the tortoise scale exacerbated fire severity in Mediterranean stone pine forests?

2025· article· en· W4411968329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFire Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeRegione CampaniaDipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei MinistriUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
KeywordsTortoiseMediterranean climateScale (ratio)GeographyEcologyEnvironmental scienceForestryArchaeologyBiologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Introduction of non-native insect species and extreme wildfire events threaten terrestrial ecosystems and their services worldwide. However, the effect of invasive sap-feeding insect species outbreaks on fire severity is poorly understood, particularly regarding their effects on fire behavior and the probability of crown fire ignition. We set up two experimental designs to investigate how the alien tortoise scale Toumeyella parvicornis influenced fire behavior dynamics and canopy surface reflectance in Mediterranean Pinus pinea stands that were severely burnt in the summer of 2017. We combined Rothermel’s model for fire surface spread and Van Wagner’s crown ignition model to simulate fire behavior and employed data from the Landsat 8 collection to detect canopy wilt symptoms related to the multivoltine T. parvicornis abundance. Results Simulating fire behavior in single-story P. pinea thinned and unthinned stands indicated that all the predicted fires were surface fires. Uncertainty analysis of the canopy fuel attribute model inputs revealed that fires in thinned stands were entirely classified as surface fires. In contrast, only 62.7% were surface fires in unthinned stands, whereas 37.3% were categorized as conditional fire types. Among the Landsat reflectance bands, only the NIR, green, and SWIR 2 were sensitive to the abundance of T. parvicornis . Based on these sensitive bands, two-band NIR-multiplied vegetation indices were significantly associated with the abundance of T. parvicornis from the fall generation onward when sooty mold consistently covered the canopy needles. Conclusion The divergence between observed and predicted fires in pine stands highlights the need to investigate the processes and variables linked to T. parvicornis feeding activity on P. pinea trees to enhance fire behavior prediction. Therefore, understanding how insect outbreaks can modify fire behavior in pine stands is crucial for effective management at the local and landscape levels. Identifying the vegetation index based on sensitive bands represents an essential step toward the early recognition of insect outbreaks on a large spatial scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it