Performance Analysis of Mixed Beaulieu‐Xie and M Dual‐Hop Amplify‐and‐Forward Relay Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This work presents a comprehensive study on the performance of an asymmetric dual‐hop radio frequency (RF)/free‐space optical (FSO) transmission system that utilizes a fixed gain amplify‐and‐forward protocol. The RF path is characterized by the Beaulieu–Xie model, and the FSO link is affected by Málaga () turbulence in the presence of pointing errors. In this study, we introduce novel and precise analytical expressions for the probability density function, the cumulative distribution function (CDF), and the moment generating function (MGF) of the overall signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). Using the derived expressions, we proceed to obtain accurate infinite series representations for the outage probability (OP), the average bit‐error rate (BER), and the ergodic capacity (EC). In addition, we conduct asymptotic analysis for the CDF, the MGF, the OP, the average BER, and the EC in the high SNR regime. Numerical results are compared with the Monte Carlo simulations to validate the accuracy of these derived expressions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".