Cypriot Healthcare Professionals’ Knowledge and Skills When Interacting With Patients With Aphasia in Clinical Settings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aphasia, a communication disorder mainly resulting from stroke, poses challenges to the meaningful interactions between healthcare professionals and people with aphasia (PWA). Little is known about the knowledge and skills of Cypriot healthcare professionals when interacting with PWA in clinical settings. This study explores the knowledge and skills of Cypriot healthcare professionals in communicating with PWA. METHOD: A total of 245 Greek-speaking Cypriot healthcare professionals completed the Greek version of the Health Professionals and Aphasia Questionnaire (HPAQ). Participants' knowledge and skills were assessed in five categories: Knowledge, Skills, Behaviour and Emotions, Practice, and Environment. Demographic data were analysed through linear regression and ANOVA to identify predictors of HPAQ scores. RESULTS: Participants' mean HPAQ score was 94.57 (SD = 28.1). Higher educational levels (master's degree) and the Speech and Language Therapy profession significantly predicted higher HPAQ scores. Moderate frequency of interaction with PWA (1-20 times/week) was also associated with improved knowledge of aphasia and better communication skills when interacting with PWA. CONCLUSION: Speech and Language Therapists exhibited higher competency in interacting with PWA compared to other healthcare professionals, highlighting their specialised training. The findings emphasise the importance of education, experience, and interaction frequency in enhancing healthcare professionals' ability to communicate effectively with PWA in clinical settings. To address identified gaps, targeted interventions, such as Communication Partner Training, are recommended to improve communication strategies and patient outcomes in Cypriot healthcare settings. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Aphasia, which affects 40% of stroke survivors in the acute phase, profoundly impacts communication abilities, leading to longer hospital stays, increased healthcare needs, and higher rates of disability. Many healthcare professionals lack the training, strategies, and resources required to effectively communicate with people with aphasia (PWA), limiting PWA's participation in decision-making and negatively impacting the quality of care. In Cyprus, there is an urgent need to evaluate and enhance healthcare professionals' competencies in supporting PWA, highlighting the importance of communication training programs in improving care quality and patient outcomes. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge This research highlights the critical need for accessible training programs at all educational levels to ensure equitable standards of stroke care in Cyprus. Moderate interaction with PWA plays a pivotal role in improving healthcare professionals' communication skills, emphasising the importance of balanced and sustainable contact opportunities that foster professional development while minimising the risk of burnout. The findings also reveal that professional experience alone does not enhance communication outcomes unless accompanied by purposeful training and meaningful interaction with PWA. The study underscores the need for targeted communication training for healthcare professionals to improve interdisciplinary collaboration and patient care outcomes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The clinical implications are as follows (a) there is a critical need to implement Communication Partner Training programs in Cypriot healthcare settings to address knowledge and skills gaps among non-speech language therapy (SLT) healthcare professionals; (b) communication training programs can create more inclusive clinical environments, enabling PWA to actively participate in healthcare decisions and rehabilitation planning; (c) training interventions should be tailored to different professional groups and educational levels, with introductory-level modules for non-SLT professionals and advanced modules for SLTs; (d) communication training has the potential to improve the quality of care, patient satisfaction, and rehabilitation outcomes for PWA; (e) these actions will provide a basis for developing scalable and targeted communication training solutions to meet diverse healthcare needs in Cyprus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".