MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411984080 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2025.2524655

Spare parts inventory management for substitute consumer products: an adaptive robust optimization approach

2025· article· en· W4411984080 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shuai Zhang, Kai Huang, Jie Chu, Rana Shariat

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpare partInventory managementBusinessComputer scienceOperations managementMarketingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a multi-period spare parts inventory system providing spare parts for several consumer durable products in an assortment is investigated. An original equipment manufacturer (OEM) fulfills the after-sales service for the sold products with a repair-replacement policy. The products can substitute each other and use common and dedicated spare parts. The failure quantity of each product is uncertain and influenced by the on-market product quantity, which is governed by customer preferences and changes over the planning periods. To repair the failed products, spare parts inventory is used. The OEM aims to minimize the total inventory costs including spare parts purchase cost, holding cost, and product backorder cost. We formulate this problem as a multi-stage adaptive robust optimization model when the probability distributions of product failures are unknown. An improved partition-and-bound method is designed to solve the model. We demonstrate its relative computational advantage over the classical partition-and-bound method through numerical experiments on small- and medium-sized problem instances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207