The Effect of Expressive Writing Therapy Combined with Self Efficacy on Quarter life crisis Score of Undergraduate Applied Nursing Program Students Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on Riskesdas 2018, the prevalence of depression in Indonesia among individuals aged 15 and above reached 6.1%, with 2% originating from the Gen Z group (ages 15–24). This indicates the potential for psychological crises such as the Quarter life crisis (QLC). QLC commonly occurs between the ages of 18–30, especially among university students. Anxiety about the future, academic pressure, career uncertainty, and high social expectations contribute to the stress that leads to QLC. One intervention that can be provided is expressive writing therapy combined with self efficacy or self belief. This study aims to determine the effect of expressive writing therapy combined with self efficacy on QLC scores. The theoretical concepts underpinning this research include QLC, expressive writing therapy, and self efficacy. The method used is quantitative pre-experimental with a one-group pretest–posttest design involving 48 university students selected through simple random sampling. The intervention was conducted over four days within one week. Data were analyzed using a dependent t-test. The quarter life crisis instrument used in this study. The results showed a significant decrease in QLC scores from 4.4385 to 3.4427, with a reduction difference of 0.99583. The p-value was 0.000 (ρ < 0.05), indicating that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. This research demonstrates that expressive writing therapy combined with self-efficacy is effective in reducing Quarter life crisis scores among university students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".