MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411989883 · doi:10.31692/2764-3433.v5i1.297

ESTADO NUTRICIONAL DA POPULAÇÃO ADULTA DE JABOATÃO DOS GUARARAPES - PERNAMBUCO

2025· article· en· W4411989883 on OpenAlexaff
Camilla de Andrade Tenório Cavalcanti, Vanessa Ribeiro Leite Celestino, Polliany Da Silva Mendonça, Fábio Antônio Mota Fonseca da Silva, Letícia Pimentel Duarte, Yasmin Marques dos Santos, Beatriz Cardoso Campos de Assunção, Sara Maria Xavier da Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Health Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Health and Education
Canadian institutionsSeneca Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nutritional status reflects an individual's health condition based on the balance between nutrient intake and utilization. The objective of this study was to identify the nutritional profile of the adult population in the municipality of Jaboatão dos Guararapes, Pernambuco. This research is a secondary data-based study, with information obtained from Sisvan, which collected data regarding the nutritional status of the adult population. The findings revealed a trend of increasing Sisvan records. The study on Sisvan in Jaboatão dos Guararapes (2019–2023) identified an 84.2% increase in records, with decreases in 2020 and 2021. The prevalence of individuals with normal weight dropped from 33.3% to 30.1%, while overweight reached 34.4% in 2023, and obesity, particularly Grade I, increased, impacting low-income populations more significantly. These findings underscore the need for strategies aimed at preventing and managing excess weight, taking into account social inequalities. Despite its limitations, Sisvan is an indispensable tool for monitoring nutrition in Brazil and developing more effective nutritional health strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.462 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Health ScienceSame topicIndigenous Health and EducationFrench-language works237,207