ESTADO NUTRICIONAL DA POPULAÇÃO ADULTA DE JABOATÃO DOS GUARARAPES - PERNAMBUCO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nutritional status reflects an individual's health condition based on the balance between nutrient intake and utilization. The objective of this study was to identify the nutritional profile of the adult population in the municipality of Jaboatão dos Guararapes, Pernambuco. This research is a secondary data-based study, with information obtained from Sisvan, which collected data regarding the nutritional status of the adult population. The findings revealed a trend of increasing Sisvan records. The study on Sisvan in Jaboatão dos Guararapes (2019–2023) identified an 84.2% increase in records, with decreases in 2020 and 2021. The prevalence of individuals with normal weight dropped from 33.3% to 30.1%, while overweight reached 34.4% in 2023, and obesity, particularly Grade I, increased, impacting low-income populations more significantly. These findings underscore the need for strategies aimed at preventing and managing excess weight, taking into account social inequalities. Despite its limitations, Sisvan is an indispensable tool for monitoring nutrition in Brazil and developing more effective nutritional health strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".