MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411991970 · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103592

VitalSurg: Outcomes From a Surgical Task-Shifting Training Program in a Humanitarian Context

2025· article· en· W4411991970 on OpenAlexafffund
Hannah Wild, Olga Bednarek, Hannah van Riswijk, Kabeer Poonia, Emmanuel Mayom Makuei Palet, Mina Salehi, J P Letoquart, Émilie Joos, Shahrzad Joharifard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of surgical education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Health and Surgery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaDalhousie University
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaInstitute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University
KeywordsTask (project management)Context (archaeology)Training (meteorology)Medical educationPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineKnowledge managementEngineeringHistoryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The Vital Surgery Training Program (VitalSurg) is a task-shifting initiative designed to build local surgical capacity in surgical deserts by training generalist doctors to perform essential procedures. Implemented in partnership with Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), the program has undergone 2 pilot iterations in South Sudan. This study evaluates the second iteration, which reflects a refined curriculum and integrated assessment strategy informed by lessons learned from the first iteration. We sought to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and adaptability of competency-based surgical training embedded within humanitarian clinical care. DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-methods summative evaluation of the training program. Quantitative trainee performance data-including pre- and postmodule quizzes, oral and written exams, case logs, and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)-were analyzed alongside qualitative data from Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with trainers, trainees, and MSF stakeholders. SETTING: This study was conducted at Aweil State Hospital, an MSF-supported district hospital in Northern Bahr El Ghazal, South Sudan, which provides maternity and pediatric surgical care in a resource-limited setting. PARTICIPANTS: Two local medical doctors were enrolled in the second VitalSurg cohort. RESULTS: Over the 18-month training program, trainees performed an average of 1305 procedures and improved across all evaluation domains. 446 EPAs were completed, with significant variation between trainees (281 vs. 165 EPAs completed; 162 vs. 53 passed), reflecting differing levels of engagement and skill acquisition. EPA pass rates ranged widely, from 81.7% for skin graft to 43.5% for Caesarean section and 22.0% for laparotomy. Competency-based education tools were feasibly implemented despite infrastructure constraints. KIIs highlighted common training challenges-including case mix, service to education ratios, and trainer variability-as well as opportunities for refinement. CONCLUSION: VitalSurg demonstrates the feasibility of embedding task-shifting surgical training into humanitarian clinical activities. This model offers a promising, scalable strategy to expand access to safe surgical care in conflict-affected settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of surgical educationSame topicGlobal Health and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207