Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conflict of interests in public procurement procedures in Romania is a particularly important subject, having a significant impact on the transparency and integrity of the procurement process. Romania has a legislative framework that regulates conflicts of interest in public procurement, the main normative act being Law no. 98/2016 on public procurement. According to Art. 59 of Law no. 98/2016, the conflict of interest is defined as “any situation in which members of the staff of the contracting authority or ofa procurement service provider acting on behalf of the contracting authority, who are involved in carrying out the award procedure or who can influence its outcome have, directly or indirectly, a financial, economic or other personal interest, which could beperceived as an element that compromises their impartiality or independence in the context of the award procedure.”This article represents an analysis of the current Romanian regulation of the conflict of interest in public procurement procedures and of the measures imposed to prevent, identify and remedy a conflict-of-interest situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it