MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411995886 · doi:10.1109/jerm.2025.3578677

QRWOA-VMD Enhanced Heart Rate Monitoring Using PCR Radar

2025· article· en· W4411995886 on OpenAlexaff
Zhimeng Xu, Dan Li, Liangqin Chen, Yueming Gao, Zhizhang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Electromagnetics RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRadarEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingComputer scienceGeographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring vital signs is essential for assessing individuals' health status and supporting various medical interventions; however, conventional methods depend on expensive and invasive hospital-based or wearable devices. This article presents a novel approach to contactless heart rate monitoring that leverages an Antenna-on-Package Pulse Coherent Radar (AoP PCR) system. To address the inherently low sampling rates associated with the pulse repetition frequency of the PCR during remote monitoring, a signal enhancement algorithm is presented. This algorithm leverages the quasi-periodic nature of chest displacement signals, leading to significantly improved temporal resolution and enabling reliable heart rate monitoring using a cost-effective PCR system. Furthermore, extracting heartbeat signals faces a significant challenge in optimally tuning the parameters of Variational Modal Decomposition (VMD) due to variations in distance and angle. To tackle this, an enhanced method called VMD based on the Whale Optimization Algorithm with Quasi-Reflection Learning (QRWOA-VMD) has been devised to enhance the precision of parameter optimization in VMD, thereby improving the decomposition accuracy of heartbeat signals across diverse angles and distances, leading to more reliable and robust heartbeat signal extraction. Comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that the proposed method achieves over 97% accuracy in heart rate monitoring under standard conditions, with the radar facing the chest within a 1.5-meter range. Even in challenging scenarios, such as a ±30° azimuth angles and a 20° elevation angle relative to the chest, accuracy remains above 93%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Electromagnetics RF and Microwaves in Medicine and BiologySame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207